Tag Archives: Benefits

L&H: Employers Entertain Paying Individual Premiums 

Misty Baker, Life & Health Insurance Information

Employer groups are asking agents why they can’t pay for their employees’ individual premiums either on or off the exchange. Agents can easily find answers to protect their clients from making this costly mistake in several recent IRS publications.

Under IRS notice 2013-54 an employer that reimburses employees for their individual health insurance, inside or outside the Marketplace, has created an employer payment plan. An employer payment plan, according to this notice is considered to be a group health plan subject to market reforms, including the prohibition on annual limits for essential health benefits and the requirement to provide certain preventive care without cost sharing.

On May 13, 2014, the IRS issued FAQs addressing the consequences for employers that do not establish a health insurance plan for their own employees, but instead reimburse those employees for premiums they pay for health insurance. Because these employer payment plans do not comply with the ACA’s market reforms, the IRS indicated in the FAQs that these arrangements may be subject to an excise tax of $100 per day for each applicable employee ($36,500 per year, per employee) under Code section 4980D.

The notice does not reference an arrangement under which an employee may have an after-tax amount applied toward health coverage or take that amount in cash compensation. The IRS implies that the arrangement could still be subject to the $100 per day per employee excise tax penalty.

For more information on employee benefits, contact Misty Baker.

Tagged , , , , , ,

Agencies Release Exchange-Related COBRA Guidance

Agencies Release Exchange-Related COBRA Guidance

by Christine Roberts

http://eforerisa.wordpress.com/2014/05/05/agencies-release-exchange-related-cobra-guidance/ 

Recent weeks have seen the publication of several pieces of agency guidance that reflect the increasing prominence of individual coverage on the health exchanges as an alternative to continuation of group coverage under COBRA. The new guidance consists of:

  • updated model COBRA notices from the Department of Labor that describe exchange coverage as a COBRA alternative;
  • DOL proposed regulations that streamline issuance of future model COBRA notices;
  • an announcement of, and links to, the new model COBRA notices and proposed regulations, in Affordable Care Act FAQ XIX, together with guidance on other ACA issues; and
  • announcement, in a Department of Health and Human Services bulletin, of a limited special enrollment period permitting those who elected COBRA coverage under outdated election forms to drop it, between now and July 1, 2014, and enroll in coverage on a federally facilitated exchange (FFE); and
  • an FAQ published by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Centers clarifying the circumstances under which COBRA qualified beneficiaries may switch to exchange coverage.

Each development is discussed in turn, below.

Updated COBRA Notices

On May 2, 2014, the Department of Labor, the agency responsible for COBRA notice and disclosure duties, published online updated versions of both the “general” notice (given upon initial plan eligibility), and the “election” notice (triggered by a qualifying event). The notices now expressly identify the availability of exchange coverage, including access to premium tax credits for those eligible, as an alternative to COBRA coverage. The model notices currently are posted online at the DOL website in English, and Spanish language versions will soon follow.

Proposed DOL Regulations re: COBRA Notices 

Also on May 2, 2014, the Department of Labor issued an advance copy of proposed regulations (technically, a “Notice of Proposed Rulemaking”) pursuant to which future model COBRA notices may appear in written agency guidance, including through online posting, rather than as “appendices” to proposed and final regulations published in the Federal Register. One of the stated reasons for this approach is to “eliminate confusion that may result from multiple versions of the model notices being available at different locations.” And in fact, if view the online version of DOL Technical Release 2013-02, which in May of last year announced earlier exchange-related revisions to the model COBRA election notice, the link to the model notice link now clicks through to the most recent update posted last week, rather than to the version that originally was issued with the Technical Release.

 Summary of COBRA Developments in ACA FAQ Part XIX

May 2, 2014 also saw publication online of Affordable Care Act FAQs Part XIX, of which Q&A 1 summarizes the above developments and directs readers to the new model COBRA notices and the proposed regulation.

FAQ Part XIX contains additional guidance on a number of ACA issues including cost-sharing limitations, coverage of preventive services, and Summaries of Benefits and Coverage. I will cover this new guidance soon in a separate post.

Special Enrollment Period to Transfer from COBRA to FFE Coverage

Generally, an individual may enroll him or herself in exchange coverage upon first becoming eligible for COBRA, during an exchange open enrollment period, or upon exhausting COBRA coverage. However, persons currently enrolled in COBRA may have elected to do on the basis of COBRA notices that did not identify exchange coverage as a COBRA alternative in these situations. Accordingly, on May 2, 2014 the Department of Health and Human Services issued a bulletin announcing a limited special enrollment period, lasting until July 1, 2014, during which COBRA qualified beneficiaries in states that use the Federally Facilitated Exchange or Marketplace may drop COBRA coverage and enroll on the FFE. The guidance does not mandate that state-run exchanges extend the same special enrollment period.

CMS FAQ re: Transition from COBRA to Exchange Coverage

Lastly, on April 21, 2014 the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) posted an online FAQ https://www.regtap.info/faq_printe.php?id=1496 asking whether someone who voluntarily drops COBRA coverage during an exchange open enrollment period may enroll in the exchange (and, if eligible, qualify for premium tax credits). CMS made clear that this transition is possible even for someone whose COBRA has not expired, and that enrollment on the exchange is permitted any time during the year for someone whose COBRA coverage has expired. The FAQ made it clear that a qualified beneficiary whose COBRA coverage had not yet expired could not enroll in exchange coverage outside the annual exchange open enrollment period. (The next exchange open enrollment period is from November 14, 2014 to February 15, 2015.)

 Speculation as to COBRA’s Future

Against that background, some speculation as to COBRA’s future is warranted. COBRA continuation coverage, enacted in 1985, was in essence a legislative response to pricing and underwriting barriers to individual coverage that the Affordable Care Act has either eliminated (for instance, by banning pre-existing condition exclusions) or made less burdensome (for instance, through access to premium tax credits and cost sharing on the exchanges).   Without question, the health exchanges are a “disruptive technology” to the COBRA model, but COBRA continuation coverage likely will remain in some demand until such time as individual exchange coverage is comparable, in terms of provider networks and in other respects, to current group coverage.  That tipping point may not occur for some years, or even at all.      What is likely in the short term is that COBRA’s already steep adverse selection rate will continue to climb, as continuation of group coverage becomes more and more about retaining access to a broad network of healthcare providers.

Tagged , , , ,

Benefits of First Aid Training in the Workplace

Most Businesses are not legally obliged to provide staff with on-site Health and Safety training. However, with incoming Health Care Reform and nationwide promotion of wellness in the workplace, more and more companies are beginning to offer First Aid training to staff. In light of this, we explore the benefits of making First Aid training a requirement in the workplace.02F66770

Practical benefits

First and foremost, introducing an ‘in-house’ First Aid Training Scheme has its practical benefits:

  • All employees become more safety aware, helping bring down the number of accidents;
  • First Aid saves lives, particularly where there are grave injuries and it is critical that immediate action is taken;
  • First Aid training does not have to take a long time, some managed training courses are only a few hours long;
  • First Aid trainees know exactly what’s in their first aid kits, how to use the contents and the various ways to react in an emergency;
  • The training gives employees critical knowledge and the confidence to effectively manage an emergency without fear or confusion;
  • They learn how to give injections, use painkillers, bandage injuries and control blood flow.

Tailored to the Industry

While outside First Aid programmes are widely available and supported on many fronts, ‘in-house’ first-aid programmes allow the company to tailor the scheme to suit their place of work and their financial capabilities. As well as that, on-site first-aid programmes can be incorporated into the company’s overall risk management strategy, reducing the need for a massive overhaul of current policy.

The problem with outsider First Aid programs is that they are generally run as a ‘one size fits all’ process. With ‘in-house’ first-aid programs, you can determine the learning criteria, based on the requirements of the workplace. For example, First-Aid training for a large office will differ from a first-aid programme designed for a construction agency. In-house training allows the company to specify what areas need to be covered and apply the learning to simulated scenarios that could occur in the workplace.

Cost

The main concern of companies in terms of the cost of introducing in-house training is considering the right provider and the exact number of sessions they should deliver, as well as the number of participating employees.

At first glance, it may sound like there’s a lot to consider in terms of the company’s budget. However, once you take into account the financial effects of workplace injuries, reducing accident severity and potential through first aid training can save a company quite a bit of money in the long term.

Employee Morale

It is hugely important to consider Employee morale in the overall business process, no matter what industry you operate in. At the end of the day results will depend on the efforts of your staff and if morale is low, the work is going to suffer.

By providing onsite First Aid training you can demonstrate how you care for the welfare of your employees and show them how they are valued in the workplace.

Providing First Aid training doesn’t cost Businesses a lot of money, however, workplace accidents do. By introducing an in-house scheme tailored to meet the demands of your workplace, you can sure up your company’s risk management plan and ultimately ensure the safety of those connected with the business.

If you are considering introducing an ‘in-house’ First Aid Training scheme, contact us directly for advice on how to do so.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Health Insurance Served On A Silver Platter

January 1, 2014 marks the start of Obamacare as the U.S. will experience changes in health insurance. With the health insurance marketplaces opening all over the nation in October, 2013, now is the time to be considering what type of health insurance you will be applying for, including Medicare or Medicaid.

Medicare vs. Medicaid

Medicare and Medicaid are both government programs that help people pay for health care. Medicare is generally for the elder and disabled, while Medicaid is for people with limited income and resources. Many low-income individuals are unaware of the positive opportunities the healthcare reform will create for them.

Comprehensive Coverage

Under the health care reform, all health plans being offered on state exchange must provide comprehensive coverage, but not all plans offer the same level of coverage. For many people Medicaid will serve as a safety net for health coverage. Medicaid is a free and comprehensive health plan that is easy to apply for. In order to receive Medicaid, however, you need to be approved as eligible. You will be asked to provide your social security number as well as an income statement. So although you will not get denied health coverage under Obamacare, Medicare or Medicaid may deny you.

Coverage That Works For You

Do you want to opt for Medicaid or Medicare? A good thing about Obamacare is that it will result in free Medicare preventative services. Although without fear of denial when applying for any type of health insurance coverage, it may be worth looking into other options. When the health care exchange takes place in October make sure you weigh your options based on both coverage and cost.

Benefits of Obamacare

Besides having your pick of the litter when it comes to coverage, there are several other important benefits of Obamacare. Beginning in 2014 no one will be able to be denied health care as a result of a pre-existing condition. This is important to everyone who has conditions ranging from cancer to pregnancy. This also affects children under the age of 19 who have pre-existing conditions. There will be free preventative services to all women including breastfeeding, contraception, domestic violence, and HIV screening and counseling. Obamacare will also limit insurers’ ability to charge unreasonably high premiums for private coverage.

Have more questions? Visit our Healthcare Reform Library or contact us  for more information.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , ,